Home > News

May-12-2019 Categories: news

I've had it appear just twice, but accurately bygone an attempted lurer at Ice strykewyrms in the wilderness attempted to abstract me with abandoned babble as he stood ontop of the wyrms I attacked acquisitive for me to AoE and skull/misclick him.


I told him it wasn't traveling to appear and RuneScape gold sale hopped worlds alone to acquire him accompany my association chat, (over which I acquire no control) and apple hop to chase up with a quick PK for defying him.


I'm not abiding if this is breaking the rules, but it in actuality leaves me with no recourse awaiting allurement my association babble to accord me added privileges.


I DO apperceive that his attack at adorable by aggravating to get me to accidentally tag him was adjoin the rules though.


I anticipate a band-aid actuality would be apparent with a alternation of steps:


- Guests cannot see the apple of association associates until 5 account in the association chat.


- Guests cannot see the apple of association associates who are currently in the wilderness EVER


- Abutting the apple of anyone in a association babble should anticipate you from advancing them for 5 minutes.


- While in the wilderness, guests abutting association chats should be accent to a amateur and this should opt-out rather than opt-in.


I've attempted a few things here. Firstly, I apprehend that abounding times PKers use alts so accepting clumsy to grief/follow players in the wilderness is able through 1 & 2.


Since abounding activities can absorb entering and departure the wilderness, 3 should admonition breach this.


Finally, accepting the actuality that anyone is potentially tracking you accent evens the arena acreage and allows you to acknowledge at the association akin rather than artlessly accepting to your fate.


We shouldn't be punished for accepting in association chats - period.

www.rsgoldfast.com