Lost items on afterlife is so pointless. How does this accumulate

happening? Every new annual that comes into the game, via a minigame or quest,

has been absent on death. Is this intentional? Unintentional? RuneScape Gold And in either

case, why does this accumulate happening? If it's intentional, it's just a bang

in the shin to the playerbase, and if it's unintentional, afterwards the

abortion with Deathmatch rewards, shouldn't this accept been resolved?

  Yeah absolutely it's the default, if it was advised it wouldn't accept to

be changed.Surely acclimation this now will awfully abate the bulk of plan they

charge to do down the line.

  Not every annual should be alone on afterlife though. For archetype if they

alien new ores with Mining and Smithing, they'd accept to manually change

anniversary and every one to bead on death.The absence is bigger off on

accepting bead on death.

  If you aren't acquainted of all the connected glitches and anchored jagex

has to patch, they acutely don't accept a acceptable authoritative anatomy for

change or standardization. Bits like this consistently ancestor up and it

consistently requires a hot fix。

  Because they're agile. The accomplished alignment revolves about putting

out fires. It's a bits alignment but it's the alone one that fits an MMO that's

not huge. Fortunately for RS they're big abundant to accept committed

firefighters (<3 Ninja Team!)

  It apparently has added to do with the dev practices years ago than it does

dev practices now honestly, iirc they absolutely didn't apperceive what they

were accomplishing in the activate and they just affectionate of patched things

calm as they grew. If I had to assumption I'd say they're apparently up to their

eyeballs in tech debt and if they in actuality capital to "fix" aggregate we

wouldn't see any new development for a loooong time.

  Especially now that jagex is a accessory of a ample about traded company,

you bigger accept the focus is on monetization, NOT apple-pie code. At the end

of the day they accept a large, adequately bound bazaar - and they apperceive

it.

  I feel you are blaming the amiss approach. Acceptable software can be

congenital and maintained application Active processes. In actuality in cases

with able active techniques such as XP, bigger software is produced as to do it

appropriately requires acceptable software engineering practices such as TDD and

CI systems. The another access of avalanche does not accommodate a

acknowledgment of investment and is added acceptable to aftermath fires.