I was analytical to how bad the 2K abeyant arrangement in actuality was. I chose to agreement with Malick Richardson. I fabricated him as adolescent as I could and maxed out his potential. He would not play a individual minute the blow of his career. He started off the bold as a 70 overall of NBA 2K18 MT.
By the alpha of the 2023-4 division he had developed to a 88. Now, acutely I bare to do this aforementioned experiment, but area he plays the max bulk of minutes. He at the aforementioned point, he concluded up at a 90 overall.
Now, you may be accept with a amateur basically accepting at the aforementioned accomplishment akin by never playing, but I'm abiding as hell not. I abandoned adulation the way EA does their abeyant system. They accolade XP credibility you/the CPU can absorb on a player.
The amateur is assigned a Dev-trait, and that grants added or beneath XP points. And if a amateur wins awards/meet goals, afresh they will get even added XP points. Its not even a little complicated and can calmly be adopted by 2K.
P.S. Anyone account this, I'd like some advice. I plan on accomplishing a huge test, searching at potential, the way the CPU drafts, the way the CPU signs chargeless agents, and added little things I notice. This massive activity would yield a anniversary at minimum. Anyone anticipate it would be payed absorption to on this subreddit? Or would I be crumbling my time?
Basically teams just apperceive everyone's abeyant so it affectionate of charcoal the blemish division surprise. Say for archetype I'm a 65 all-embracing with 99 potential, I'll be accepting like 30 account a bold because they apperceive of the abeyant some how and want me as a amateur to get bags of acquaintance for me to progress.
I don't in fact like this arrangement because it removes the abruptness aspect of a blemish player. There's a agglomeration of added factors like backbone that go in to it. But at the end of the day all that progression in fact relies on is abundant play time and a bit of potential. I ran this analysis with Kris Dunn and affronted him in to a 97 overall.
To add to your point, it aswell charcoal a lot of the drafts in MyGM / MyLeague mode. I accept a guy in my accepted abstract chic who's a low 70's amateur but has batty potential. Definitely the abduct of the chic - realistically to be best somewhere in the 6-10 ambit with his appraisement (it's not a able class).
BUT NO - for some reason, he is the accord #1 pick, even admitting there are 5-7 guys in the chic who are acutely bigger than him appropriate now.
In my opinion, 2k(2K MT) should not acquiesce us to see a guy's abeyant as a number. Accept it be the abandoned appraisement that charcoal as a numeric brand at all times. A-Grade abeyant could beggarly annihilation from the added advancing of MJ to "should advance into a ambiguous All Star". Accomplish things beneath predictable.