You see, the abstraction of Futties is advised to accord appropriate cards to the communities favourite card.

Definition of favourite: ‘preferred to all others of the aforementioned kind'.

So this agency the agenda that wins, is the agenda that is adopted by the majority of the fifa community. You see the way voting works, is that whoever gets the a lot of votes, it's acutely the favourite.

The abecedarian with the a lot of votes was Fred. So he gets the appropriate card. Yes Renato Sanchez would accept been a abundant card, but he didn't deserve it. The appropriate agenda is aloof for the favourite player, and as Renato didn't get the a lot of amount of votes, he isn't the favourite.

Do the Fred SBC or not, it's up to you. Just don't be acrid the abecedarian you voted for didn't win. Alone I would accept admired a Partey Party.

This agitation comes up appealing abundant every year about this time. Humans end up accepting acrid about their aces not acceptable and accuse about it.

Not necessarily. Any of the six nominees so far could accept won and I'd still criticize things. Simply, the arrangement could still be bigger so that appear the end of the game, humans accept a adventitious to play for a abbreviate while with a high-quality abecedarian they enjoy.

We could vote for players as we do now but three SBCs are given, with upgrades analogous breadth the abecedarian came in voting. You could alone complete the abecedarian you voted for. Simple enough.

Rewards the champ while still giving others an upgraded abecedarian of the one they voted for, and allows anniversary abecedarian to accept altered requirements/price.

All that said, I do acclaim EA for their voting style. Earlier in the year a accepted complaint on the sub was that Futties would about-face to accommodation picks like with Approaching Stars but honestly, it's decidedly bigger as humans don't account from just voting for the accomplished rated player.