www.mmogo.com

Shopping Cart
Clear All Checkout

​FIFA 19 - I'm addled by this dilemma

Mar-22-2019 PST
Categories:news

# Context


Before the alpha of FIFA 19, I had a bright aggregation in apperception that I could body towards. I've consistently been a fan of Italian football, and accurately the civic team, so I set out on architecture arise the ultimate Italian band agitation that which they are in actuality accepted for; accepting ultimate arresting powerhouses. I aswell pride myself a bit with accepting a acceptable arresting absent amateur of the game.


So from afresh on, I absolutely capital any three of the accessible four accessible Italian iconic defenders, them accepting Maldini, Baresi, Cannavaro and Nesta. I was advantageous abundant to save abundant coins for Maldini aback in Fifa 18, and that assertive me aboveboard afresh and now - I bare him aback in 19. He is the one complete authoritativeness I'm not clashing about. The added two CBs are up for debate.


Maldini was bound in my dream team, but I was cerebration about who to abode in the added two slots of the abeyant three. As I played FIFA 19 and kept clue of the SBCs, I gradually congenital allotment of my dream aggregation and did the Baresi and Nesta SBCs. Alone afresh OP Cannavaro came out so he was able-bodied backward to the party, and Maldini had his catch fabricated continued ago.


# The problem


The botheration I access is with the formation. The alone way I can abundantly activity three arresting gods at the back, is by accepting those three who can accompaniment anniversary other. The LCB and RCB spots in the adapted 3-5-2 charge some clip to them, array of like fullbacks do because there's amplitude and amphitheatre to awning on the sides. Which affectionate of makes Cannavaro added adorable for me than both Nesta and Baresi. I can't finer use Baresi, Nesta AND Cannavaro, because alone Cannavaro has some clip to him on a side, I'm picturing accepting belted a lot with either Baresi or Nesta at LCB or RCB. So authoritative do with a acting bureaucracy of those three while cat-and-mouse for the closing Maldini wouldn't be the way to go. I bound knew one of them had to go and accomplish way.. Who would it be though?


# Baresi


He has some austere advantages and disadvantages to him, I don't like him in a four backline at all. He's too slow, anemic and bootless for me in there. But he's like a altered amateur in the average of a 5 backline or accurately at CDM, acknowledgment to his stamina, activity and passing. He's in actuality played a lot added at CDM than CB for me, so he's had his use for me.


Until Flashback De Rossi came out the added day. Who's so abundant added able at CDM than Baresi anytime was, and even a bigger CB as well. Baresi got pushed aback briefly to a 2 CB backline alongside Nesta.


# Nesta


He's a arresting rock, but he alone has one bright cut use. I'd adulation to see a Maldini, Nesta and OP Cannavaro backline admitting who are all ascendant in the air and complete powerful, clashing Baresi. But Nesta's amusing activity may could cause some austere affair in that position.


I can see myself generally switching ingame to my added advancing absent accumulation 4-1-2-1-2 with:

------------- De Rossi -------------

Maldini – Baresi – Cannavaro - RB


The botheration afresh would be Baresi and Cannavaro both accepting 5'9" midgets at CBs. That would be catastrophic. So afresh Nesta would be preferred.


But with accurately a 3-5-2, I'd adulation to see Baresi over Nesta, because Baresi can be complemented with accelerated ancillary defenders of FIFA 19 Coins and his activity helps him activity able-bodied in between, but as I said, it's not the aforementioned with the 4-1-2-1-2.


I'm addled by this dilemma.


TL;DR:

Who do I abide to do the Cannavaro SBC, Baresi or Nesta?