www.mmogo.com

Shopping Cart
Clear All Checkout

​FIFA 19 - A anticipation on the accepted PTB meta

Feb-15-2019 PST
Categories:news

A anticipation on the accepted PTB meta - EA's advance at accuracy vs absolute reality. One of the counterexamples that gets befuddled about if humans accuse about the esplanade the bus meta is that these approach are accustomed in able football, FIFA 19 Coins and that it has been able for teams accomplished and present. Managers like Simeone, Mourinho, et al are cited.


The aloft classic makes sense, if FIFA was a authentic simulation of football, but that's in fact breadth the altercation begins. EA acutely picks and chooses what aspect of "realism" they ambition to inject into the game, while added aspects of the bold couldn't be added from reality. One classic is the antic aggressiveness of defenders with top concrete and arresting stats. Some of these players accept their own gravitational cull that slows your players down if they're in the vicinity. This is a acutely air-conditioned accomplishing of arresting presence, and has no absolute abject in reality, but this is a video game, so breadth do we draw the banned if it comes to the accomplishing of arresting stats and concrete stats?


This brings me aback to the beforehand point about the PTB meta. A acutely austere adherence to what we see in absolute activity seems casuistic if you consider:


1. EA isn't constant with this in the aboriginal place.

2. The mechanics of a video bold do NOT carefully associate with realism.


The additional point seems appealing cocky evident. If a aggregation comes up adjoin addition aggregation that is arena a low block in their own half, with at atomic 8 players aback in aegis (not including the GK), this compresses the acreage for attackers in the final third. Acreage of eyes is by itself lower because there's beneath bend to attending at, and because of width, players are consistently affective in and out of anniversary other's vision. This is why advanced play is emphasized more, as wingers and fullbacks accomplish from an in fact altered bend to the bend accepting apparent by the players in the middle.


Now, instead of cerebration about this critically, EA just overpowers the arresting AI wholesale, because they aren't because the constraints on advancing players in the final third. If you watch a football bold played in a amphitheater with a camera bend that is added bird's eye view, you WILL atom that there is advancing movement off the ball, and there are defenders consistently accepting pulled out of position, abrogation gaps. However, how a aggregation exploits this depends on the eyes of the players that get on the ball.


In FIFA, you accept the advantage of accepting this bird's eye appearance with a camera bend such as co-op. You aswell accept abounding players with top eyes and casual stats, yet abounding of these players are abortive in the accepted meta. Anticipate of players like Modric and David Silva that accept these abundant casual stats, yet their appulse in abecedarian seems minimal. Their stats are abortive afterwards the requisite off brawl movement in this game, which is anon afflicted by the arresting attendance of defenders. Now you add in added players with their own arresting attendance in a bankrupt space, and all this acutely overpowers whatever advancing attendance that is in the area.


You can see some of this play out if you see your abecedarian accomplish a acceptable advance at accepting in amplitude central the box and afresh go backwards appear a arresting player, if that arresting abecedarian accomplish up. I don't accept video proof, but I agreement abounding humans accept accomplished this.


So breadth is the absolute for this blazon of thing? It is easier if you accept bigger players, so it would accomplish faculty for EA to abide on with this and allure you with bigger players, but aloft that, a austere catechism consistently charcoal apropos accuracy v video bold simulation.


With PTB, it seems to me that in adjustment to arch the gap amid college rated/op defenders, and lower rated/weak attackers, there needs to be some akin of accommodation at college levels of play. If I authority control continued abundant adjoin a aggregation that is PTB, my players should be able to acquisition gaps the best I authority possession. How continued you charge to authority control afore your players acquisition some gaps should apparently be about to how acceptable your attackers are vs how acceptable the opposing defenders are. As it currently stands, already you alpha accepting to G1/Elite levels in WL, and Div3 or aloft in Rivals, the superior of your aggregation is the bigger way to arch the gap amid you and the players aloft you. Your accomplishment akin is neutered if you accept a beneath meta team, because players at the top are absolute acceptable at abject the OP arresting AI. Add in GK movement, and you're in for a asperous time afterwards a band that is up to par. There accept been times breadth I've watched some acceptable players accept 20-25 canyon moves in the final third that breach down because they can't acquisition able movement from the players on the pitch. As it stands, it doesn't even accomplish faculty to play on annihilation except the counter.


I apperceive it's a continued post, but any ascribe will be appreciated. Maybe there's a bigger way to apparatus a way in which gaps amid aggregation superior can be bridged to accord some advantage to players that are added skilled. I am not even speaking from my own bend here. There are affluence of top players that accept accurate agnate concerns.